Category: Uncategorized

In a move that left the internet buzzing, political rising star Karoline Leavitt surprised her fans with a series of eye-catching beach photos. The 26-year-old Republican firebrand shared images of herself confidently wearing a daring thong bikini, showcasing a side the public rarely sees. Within hours, the pictures went viral, igniting a firestorm of reactions across social media platforms.
Leavitt, who gained national recognition as one of the youngest conservative commentators and congressional candidates, has long been known for her sharp political takes—not swimsuit photos. That’s why this unexpected glimpse into her private life stunned both fans and critics. It wasn’t just about fashion; it sparked a broader conversation about image, freedom, and the pressure placed on young women in public life.

The photos, taken on a private beach in New Hampshire, revealed Leavitt confidently posing in a vibrant red thong bikini under the sun. The location seemed carefully chosen—both serene and symbolic—perhaps representing her youthful energy and strong personality. Her confident smile and relaxed demeanor contrasted sharply with the high-stakes world of Washington politics.
Some praised her for embracing her femininity and being unafraid to express herself outside of the political sphere. “She’s human, young, and allowed to live her life,” commented one Twitter user, reflecting the sentiments of many fans. Others argued that women in politics should be held to different standards, reigniting a decades-old debate about gender roles in public leadership.

Despite some backlash, Leavitt’s decision to share the photos seemed intentional—and strategic. Her supporters suggested that this was a bold statement against the rigid expectations placed on female leaders. By posting confidently, she seemed to assert that women can be strong and stylish, intellectual and sexy, all at once.

This wasn’t the first time Leavitt sparked headlines with her unapologetic authenticity. In previous interviews, she has spoken candidly about the pressures she faces as a young conservative woman navigating media scrutiny. However, this latest move takes that authenticity to a new level—one that merges politics, personality, and pop culture.

Major conservative voices chimed in as well, with mixed reactions. Some commentators warned that the attention could distract from her political messaging, while others applauded her boldness as a modern expression of empowerment. Whether admired or criticized, the fact remains: people are talking about Karoline Leavitt.

The photos also raised questions about where the line lies between private freedom and public image. Is it possible to be both a serious political figure and a cultural icon? Karoline’s bikini photos put that very question in the spotlight. She may not have intended to stir such a debate, but it’s one that’s hard to ignore.

Fashion experts even weighed in, noting that the red thong bikini is a statement piece, symbolizing boldness and self-love. The color choice, combined with her confident body language, projected strength rather than mere aesthetics. It was clear that every element of the shoot was carefully curated—even if it felt spontaneous.

For her part, Leavitt has remained mostly silent amid the attention, letting the photos speak for themselves. Her official accounts haven’t responded to the media frenzy, and no formal statement has been released. That silence only adds to the mystery and intrigue surrounding the photoshoot.

While critics have used the images to question her seriousness as a political figure, her defenders argue the opposite. They see this as a moment of cultural redefinition—proof that women in politics are no longer bound to outdated standards of appearance and behavior. In many ways, it reflects the growing shift toward authenticity over tradition in American leadership.

As the debate continues, one thing is clear: Karoline Leavitt has become a name that transcends the usual political headlines. Whether she’s in a debate or on the beach, people are watching, reacting, and talking. This sudden spotlight might just set the tone for how young female politicians navigate visibility in the digital age.

In the end, this moment might be less about a bikini and more about a broader movement. A new generation of leaders is redefining what power looks like—and it includes moments of vulnerability, beauty, and unapologetic self-expression. Karoline Leavitt didn’t just share photos; she sparked a conversation.

And perhaps that’s the most powerful thing a public figure can do—remind us that even those in the spotlight are still human. With a smile, a swimsuit, and a sunset, Karoline Leavitt has done just that. Whether you admire her or not, you can’t deny the impact.

In a world moving at breakneck speed, where technology and new generations set the pace of daily life, there’s something that’s slowly being lost: the emotional connection with our elders. This week, a video went viral on social media for a very powerful reason: it reminds us of a truth that many have forgotten.

The video, barely five minutes long, shows an older man sitting alone on a park bench. Around him, life moves quickly: young people running by, people looking at their phones without looking up, children playing without paying attention to him. In the background, soft music accompanies the images while a voiceover says: “We were all children. We were all young. But not all of us will have someone to remember us when we grow old.”

What follows is a series of scenes depicting the old man’s life: old photos, memories of his youth, moments with his family, leading up to the present,

where his loneliness is evident. Without words, but with a deep emotional charge, the video manages to touch the heartstrings. At the end, a simple but powerful phrase appears on screen: Read more below

For our benefit, He was made to bear sin (cf. 2 Cor 5:21), leading the Father to place upon His Son the burden of our transgressions. In the words of Pope Benedict XVI, this act represents a “turning of God against himself” (Deus Caritas Est, 12). God’s love extends even to His adversaries (cf. Mt 5:43-48).

The dialogue that God seeks to establish with each individual through the paschal mystery of His Son is far removed from mere idle talk, reminiscent of the ancient Athenians who “spent their time in nothing except telling or hearing something new” (Acts 17:21). Such trivial conversation, driven by a hollow and superficial curiosity, epitomizes worldliness throughout history; in contemporary times, it can manifest as the inappropriate use of media.

A wealth to be shared, not hoarded
Placing the paschal mystery at the heart of our existence compels us to empathize with the suffering of the crucified Christ, reflected in the countless innocent victims of conflict, assaults on life—from the unborn to

the elderly—and various forms of violence. This suffering is also evident in environmental catastrophes, the inequitable distribution of the earth’s resources, human trafficking in all its manifestations Read more below

The internet is no stranger to viral moments that spark conversation, and recently, actress Kaley Cuoco—best known for her role in The Big Bang Theory—found herself at the center of online discussions. Cuoco’s latest social media post featuring swimsuit photos has drawn mixed reactions from fans and followers alike.

The Debate Around Celebrity Social Media Posts
Celebrities frequently share glimpses of their personal lives, including vacation snapshots and fashion choices, but these posts often invite differing opinions. While many fans praised Cuoco’s confidence and style, others questioned whether such images were appropriate, particularly given her widespread influence.

The conversation surrounding this topic touches on larger issues, such as the balance between personal expression and public influence. Some argue that celebrities should be mindful of their younger audience and the message their posts may send. Others believe that personal social media accounts are a space for self-expression, and public figures should have the freedom to share content as they see fit.

It is with profound sadness that the entertainment community and fans around the world mark the passing of Patrick Adiarte, the gifted actor whose career spanned Broadway stages, Hollywood films, and the groundbreaking television series MASH*. Adiarte, who died on April 15, 2025, at the age of 82 from complications of pneumonia, leaves behind a body of work that remains as vibrant and touching today as when he first appeared before audiences. Best remembered for his portrayal of the gentle orphan Ho‑Jon in the inaugural season of MASH*, his contributions to the performing arts extend far beyond a single role, reflecting a lifetime devoted to bringing depth, humanity, and grace to every character he portrayed.

Early Beginnings: From Honolulu to Broadway’s Spotlight
Born on February 20, 1942, in the Hawaiian Islands, Patrick Adiarte’s artistic journey began in a close‑knit family that recognized his natural flair for performance. His parents, themselves of mixed Filipino and Spanish heritage, encouraged his early interest in dance and theater. By the age of eight, young Patrick was already participating in local school productions and community dance recitals, demonstrating a precocious talent that would soon carry him beyond the shores of his home state.

The King and I: A Formative Role
Adiarte’s first major break arrived when he was cast as one of the royal children in the original Broadway production of The King and I (1951). Under the direction of the legendary Joshua Logan and alongside Yul Brynner’s magnetic performance as the King of Siam, Patrick held his own in the demanding children’s chorus. Critics praised the youthful cast for their precision and charm; among them, Patrick’s vivacity and stage presence did not go unnoticed. His Broadway tenure lasted for multiple seasons, during which he also understudied various featured roles, a testament to his rapid growth as a performer.

Transition to Film: Prince Chulalongkorn on Screen
The success of The King and I onstage led director Walter Lang to invite Patrick to reprise his role in the 1956 film adaptation. Now portraying Prince Chulalongkorn—one of Anna Leonowens’s royal pupils—Adiarte delivered a performance that balanced youthful curiosity with the burgeoning dignity of a future monarch. Sharing the screen with Brynner once more, he navigated the transition from stage to celluloid with remarkable ease, earning plaudits for his ability to convey complex emotions without the benefit of extensive dialogue. This early fusion of musicality and dramatic insight foreshadowed the versatility that would define his career.

A Flourishing Film and Television Career
Although the role of Prince Chulalongkorn brought Patrick Adiarte to wider public attention, he did not rest on his laurels. In the ensuing years, he continued to seek diverse opportunities across both mediums, appearing in films such as All the Young Men (1960) and television anthologies including Alcoa Premiere. However, it was his casting in MASH*—first screened on CBS in September 1972—that would cement his place in popular culture.

Breaking Ground in MASH*: The Character of Ho‑Jon
Set amid the turmoil of the Korean War, MASH* blended sharp satire, heartfelt drama, and broad comedy to explore the absurdities of wartime medicine. In its first season, the character of Ho‑Jon emerged as a vital counterpoint to the irreverent antics of Hawkeye Pierce (Alan Alda) and Trapper John McIntyre (Wayne Rogers). An 11‑year‑old orphan who served as a cook and orderly at the 4077th Mobile Army Surgical Hospital, Ho‑Jon was introduced as a figure of warmth and resilience. His unwavering loyalty to the medical staff, combined with a childlike innocence, allowed viewers to glimpse the civilian plight that often goes unnoticed in stories of conflict.

Patrick’s interpretation of Ho‑Jon was quietly powerful. Without delivering lengthy monologues, he communicated volumes through a single wistful glance, a shy smile, or a moment of tender concern for his adopted mentors. Critics and audiences alike were struck by how this young character humanized the broader narrative, reminding viewers that every war—no matter how distant—is populated by vulnerable individuals whose personal struggles transcend headlines.

Behind the Scenes: Adiarte’s Impact on Cast and Crew
The bond between Patrick Adiarte and his co‑stars was more than mere professional camaraderie. Alan Alda, in later interviews, reflected on the young actor’s profound influence on the set:

“Working with Patrick was a lesson in humility and heart. His ability to convey so much with so little kept the rest of us grounded. He reminded us daily that MASH* was not just comedy—it was about hope.”

Loretta Swit (Major Margaret “Hot Lips” Houlihan) echoed these sentiments when news of his passing surfaced:

“Patrick’s spirit was as bright off‑camera as it was on. He brought laughter, he brought tears, and above all, he brought humanity to our little unit. He will be dearly missed.”

The affection extended beyond the principal cast. Crew members remembered how Adiarte—despite his youth—greeted every crewmember by name, thanked everyone from the props team to the caterers, and often offered to help coordinate scenes involving children. His professionalism, seasoned with genuine warmth, left an indelible mark on all who worked alongside him.

Fan Tributes: Ho‑Jon Lives On
In the decades since MASH* first aired, Patrick Adiarte’s portrayal of Ho‑Jon has inspired countless fan reflections and scholarly commentaries. The Instagram page @mashmatters—an online hub for enthusiasts of the series—was among the first to announce his passing. In its post, administrators highlighted not only the comfort his character provided during moments of narrative darkness but also the authenticity he lent to the show’s depiction of wartime civilian experience.

Comments poured in from around the globe:

“I first saw Ho‑Jon when I was eight years old, and he taught me what it meant to persevere with dignity. Thank you, Patrick.”

“My grandfather was a medic in Korea. He said Ho‑Jon reminded him of the young boys he tried to help. Patrick’s portrayal was a tribute to real lives.”

“Just rewatched season one for the 50th time. Patrick’s simplicity and sincerity remain unparalleled.”

These tributes underscore the fact that, even in a series celebrated for its ensemble brilliance, the gentle presence of one young actor could leave an enduring emotional resonance.

The Broader Significance of Ho‑Jon
While Ho‑Jon appeared in only the first season of MASH*, his narrative arc was crucial in establishing the series’ dual commitment to humor and heartfelt commentary. In episodes such as “Deal Me Out” and “Stop the World, I Want to Get Off,” Ho‑Jon’s interactions with the doctors revealed different facets of wartime ethics:

As a greeter and cook, he demonstrated the ways in which civilians attempted to create pockets of normalcy amid chaos.

As a symbol of innocence, he highlighted what was at stake for millions of non‑combatants caught in geopolitical turmoil.

As a surrogate son, he showed how chosen families could emerge in even the most dire circumstances.

In academic discussions of MASH*, Ho‑Jon often serves as a case study in narrative empathy. Film and television scholars note that his intermittent appearances, though limited in screen time, analogize the “perennial outsider” whose perspective offers fresh insights into the lives of those in power. Patrick Adiarte’s embodiment of this role contributed significantly to the show’s reputation not merely as situational comedy, but as a culturally resonant commentary on war and humanity.

Beyond Ho‑Jon: A Lifetime of Diverse Roles
Though Ho‑Jon remains his most celebrated character, Patrick Adiarte’s career spanned many other noteworthy roles:

Film Appearances: In All the Young Men (1960), he played a pivotal supporting role in a story about racial tensions in the U.S. Marine Corps, showcasing his dramatic versatility.

Television Work: Guest spots on series like The Ghost & Mrs. Muir and Hawaii Five‑O allowed him to explore different genres, from supernatural comedy to police procedural drama.

Stage Comebacks: In the 1980s and 1990s, Adiarte returned to theater, appearing in regional productions of South Pacific and Flower Drum Song, where critics once again praised his blend of musical dexterity and earnest stage presence.

Across each medium, a thread of compassionate authenticity wove through every part he inhabited—whether central to the plot or a crucial supporting figure.

Personal Reflections and Family Remembrances
Patrick Adiarte’s family, while private, shared a moving tribute in the days following his passing:

“Our father was a gentle soul whose life was one of service—service to his art, to his colleagues, and to the countless fans whose lives he touched. He never sought the limelight for himself; rather, he saw acting as a way to uplift and to bridge divides. We are grateful for the memories he created and the legacy he leaves behind.”

Colleagues have remarked that offstage, Adiarte was an avid gardener, a dedicated mentor to young Asian‑American performers, and a passionate advocate for greater representation in the arts. His work as a board member for the Asian American Arts Alliance further exemplified his lifelong commitment to fostering inclusivity within the performing‑arts community.

Continuing Influence: A Legacy of Empathy
In an era when representation on screen and stage remains an ongoing conversation, Patrick Adiarte’s career offers a master class in the power of authenticity. His performances challenged stereotypes and invited audiences to see the humanity in every character. Young actors today cite Ho‑Jon as an early inspiration—proof that a single role, portrayed with sincerity, can resonate across generations.

Educational institutions continue to screen MASH* episodes that feature Ho‑Jon in courses on television history and media studies. Workshops in acting schools dissect his subtle uses of gesture and facial expression, illustrating how less can often convey more. In this way, Adiarte’s influence stretches far beyond nostalgic remembrance; it becomes a practical touchstone for aspiring performers.

Final Thoughts: Remembering Patrick Adiarte
As we reflect on Patrick Adiarte’s remarkable journey—from a child performer in The King and I’s chorus to an actor whose Ho‑Jon still warms the hearts of viewers—one truth emerges clearly: he dedicated his talent to telling stories that celebrate kindness, resilience, and the dignity inherent in every individual. His passing on April 15, 2025, marks the end of an era, yet his work endures as a testament to the transformative power of performance.

In commemorating his life, let us celebrate not only the roles he inhabited but the principles he embodied: humility, empathy, and a commitment to representation. Whether on a Broadway stage, in a Hollywood film, or within the trenches of a story set in wartime Korea, Patrick Adiarte managed to shine a light on the universal threads that bind us all.

Rest in peace, Patrick Adiarte. Your legacy will continue to inspire and comfort generations to come.

For our benefit, He was made to bear sin (cf. 2 Cor 5:21), leading the Father to place upon His Son the burden of our transgressions. In the words of Pope Benedict XVI, this act represents a “turning of God against himself” (Deus Caritas Est, 12). God’s love extends even to His adversaries (cf. Mt 5:43-48).

The dialogue that God seeks to establish with each individual through the paschal mystery of His Son is far removed from mere idle talk, reminiscent of the ancient Athenians who “spent their time in nothing except telling or hearing something new” (Acts 17:21). Such trivial conversation, driven by a hollow and superficial curiosity, epitomizes worldliness throughout history; in contemporary times, it can manifest as the inappropriate use of media.

A wealth to be shared, not hoarded
Placing the paschal mystery at the heart of our existence compels us to empathize with the suffering of the crucified Christ, reflected in the countless innocent victims of conflict, assaults on life—from the unborn to

the elderly—and various forms of violence. This suffering is also evident in environmental catastrophes, the inequitable distribution of the earth’s resources, human trafficking in all its manifestations Read more below

It has been three decades since Monica Lewinsky’s name became permanently inscribed in American history — however, at the age of 51, she is now taking back her narrative in her own terms.

In her appearance on Elizabeth Day’s podcast How To Fail, the former White House intern reflected on the highly publicized affair with then-President Bill Clinton, which not only shook Washington but also nearly destroyed her life.

Lewinsky was merely 22 when the scandal erupted. Clinton was 49 and held the position of the most powerful individual in the world. The relationship captured headlines, led to an impeachment, and unleashed a torrent of public humiliation — predominantly directed at her.

She reveals whether she had genuine feelings for Bill Clinton or not.
For the first time in many years, Monica is revisiting the emotional realities surrounding the entire situation.

“It was the love of a young woman aged 22 to 24,” she stated.

“I believe there was some limerence involved along with various other factors, but that was my perspective at the time. I also think it represented an abuse of power.”

Lewinsky was candid when discussing the harmful narrative propagated by the White House following the scandal’s revelation.

“My very first job after college was at the White House,” she clarified.

“I don’t believe that anyone anticipates that a decade or more later, that individual would struggle to find employment.”

A photograph of White House intern Monica Lewinsky meeting President Bill Clinton at a White House event, submitted as evidence in documents by the Starr investigation and released by the House Judiciary Committee on September 21, 1998.

After the affair was uncovered, Lewinsky stated that the Clinton administration crafted a humiliating portrayal of her—labeling her with the outdated and derogatory term: “bimbo.”

“I was not a foolish bimbo. I was depicted as such, and that was a significant challenge for me to confront.”

She noted that a considerable amount of the backlash originated from women, despite the fact that it was a narrative “designed and disseminated by the White House.”

“That burden was taken on by many women,” she remarked.

Became the subject of ridicule
Lewinsky has previously discussed the significant impact the media frenzy had on her. She became the subject of ridicule, was pursued by journalists, and sank into a profound depression.

“I love and appreciate who I am today, but for many reasons, I would have preferred a more conventional life,” she confessed.

“I would have preferred to have had a more typical trajectory.”

In a different appearance on the Call Her Daddy podcast with host Alex Cooper, Monica delved even further into her experiences after becoming that intern.

“You were 22 years old, he was 49, you were an intern. He was the President of the United States,” Cooper framed.

Lewinsky replied:

“I was swiftly depicted as a stalker, mentally unstable, and not attractive enough.”

Highlighted one crucial aspect
The price of that reputation, she stated, was not only the loss of her anonymity but also her future.

“Due to the power dynamics and the power imbalance, I should never have been in that f***ing position,” she acknowledged.

Reflecting on the past, Monica asserts that the repercussions extended beyond her own life. She emphasizes one crucial aspect: it left enduring scars on an entire generation of women who witnessed her being publicly shamed and humiliated for a deeply personal error.

“There was immense collateral damage for women of my generation to observe a young woman being vilified on the global stage, being dissected for my sexuality, for my mistakes, for everything about me.”

https://youtube.com/watch?v=SzU9nzxSjnc%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Three decades later, Monica Lewinsky is not seeking sympathy. She is urging people to listen — and to finally recognize her as more than a mere footnote in someone else’s narrative.

Monica Lewinsky’s candid honesty compels us to question: Have we genuinely learned anything? In an era where public shaming has only intensified and accelerated, is society any more forgiving towards young women ensnared in the turmoil of powerful men and media hysteria? Or are we still repeating the same errors — merely with new hashtags?

In a world moving at breakneck speed, where technology and new generations set the pace of daily life, there’s something that’s slowly being lost: the emotional connection with our elders. This week, a video went viral on social media for a very powerful reason: it reminds us of a truth that many have forgotten.

The video, barely five minutes long, shows an older man sitting alone on a park bench. Around him, life moves quickly: young people running by, people looking at their phones without looking up, children playing without paying attention to him. In the background, soft music accompanies the images while a voiceover says: “We were all children. We were all young. But not all of us will have someone to remember us when we grow old.”

What follows is a series of scenes depicting the old man’s life: old photos, memories of his youth, moments with his family, leading up to the present,

where his loneliness is evident. Without words, but with a deep emotional charge, the video manages to touch the heartstrings. At the end, a simple but powerful phrase appears on screen: Read more below

Immigration arrests have significantly increased nationwide, more than doubling in 38 states since President Trump assumed office, as per newly released data analyzed by The New York Times.

Enforcement activities have escalated even more in recent weeks, following a directive from Trump’s chief immigration adviser, Stephen Miller, who urged agents to enhance their efforts to boost arrests.

The majority of recent immigration arrests have occurred in states with substantial immigrant populations, such as Florida and Texas, both of which had already experienced heightened enforcement levels under President Biden, according to the Times report.

Since January 20, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has apprehended over 20,000 individuals in Texas alone, despite a noticeable drop in border crossings. ICE’s Miami field office, which oversees Florida and Puerto Rico, has documented more than 11,000 arrests during the same timeframe, it noted.

In contrast, states like New Jersey and New York, which also have large immigrant populations, have seen only slight increases in enforcement compared to the previous administration. Some of the most significant surges in arrests have been reported in Southern and Western states that closely align with Trump’s immigration policies, the Times pointed out.

The newly released data offers the most comprehensive view to date of the extent and speed of immigration enforcement under the Trump administration. Acquired through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the Deportation Data Project at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, the records concentrate on arrests conducted by ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations division.

The data indicates that ICE acted quickly in January to start executing Trump’s directive to deport millions of unauthorized immigrants. Since the beginning of his second term, the agency has more than doubled its daily arrest rate, now averaging 666 arrests per day—up from fewer than 300 per day in 2024, according to the report.

As the immigration crackdown initiated by the Trump administration escalates, it has ignited protests across the nation, including heated confrontations earlier this month in Los Angeles involving demonstrators, local law enforcement, and federal agents.

In spite of the significant increase in arrests, the rate may still not meet the expectations established by Miller, who is the architect of a considerable portion of the administration’s immigration policy. During a meeting on May 21 with leaders from ICE field offices, Miller allegedly set a target of 3,000 arrests daily. Since that time, the number of arrests has surged notably, with ICE averaging over 1,100 arrests per day during the initial 10 days of June—the latest period for which data is available, as further noted by the Times.

To achieve these objectives, ICE has implemented more assertive strategies, which include detaining individuals during standard check-ins and at immigration court hearings. A significant number of those apprehended in court are now being subjected to expedited removal—a rapid deportation process that circumvents conventional legal proceedings and removes the opportunity to present a defense in court.

At the conclusion of 2024, only approximately 5 percent of those arrested faced expedited removal. By June, that percentage had risen to 15 percent, following the administration’s reduction of protections for numerous newly arrived migrants, as highlighted by the Times.

“The rate of arrests has risen in every state compared to 2024. In 21 states and the District of Columbia, the rate has more than tripled,” the report stated.

“Idaho, where data indicates that ICE conducted 77 arrests last year, has experienced the most significant change. Since January 20, ICE has executed over 300 arrests there, averaging more than two per day,” it stated. “Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, and West Virginia have witnessed the most rapid increase in ICE enforcement relative to their immigrant population sizes. In total, ICE has apprehended over 4,000 individuals in these states combined, compared to approximately 2,500 during the same period in 2024.”

Republicans have consistently contended that Democrats exploit mass illegal immigration for two main reasons: to inflate the populations of blue states to maintain congressional representation, and to ultimately advocate for amnesty to enable these individuals to vote. Trump’s commitment to mass deportation poses a threat to both of these goals.

Bradshaw, 76, is coming off another big year at FOX. The network aired the Super Bowl between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Philadelphia Eagles this year. Bradshaw, who won four Super Bowls with the Pittsburgh Steelers, led the Lombardi Trophy presentation on the Caesars Superdome field on Sunday night, February 9.

It was an up-and-down season for Bradshaw, though. He took some heat on social media for his inconsistent performances, as others suggested that it was probably time for the NFL great to call it a career.

Bradshaw, meanwhile, has said that he plans on returning in 2025 – and in 2026 and 2027, too.

“I got two years left (on my contract) at FOX. I’m 76,” Bradshaw, who has been with FOX since 1994, said before Super Bowl 59.

“If I can get to the next Super Bowl, I’ll be 80. I think that’s time.”

While Bradshaw has been on the air forever, he’s also dealt with some troubling health issues.

Terry Bradshaw on the air.
PHILADELPHIA, PA – JANUARY 29: Fox NFL Sunday analyst Terry Bradshaw looks on during the Championship game between the San Fransisco 49ers and the Philadelphia Eagles on January 29, 2023. (Photo by Andy Lewis/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

Icon Sportswire/Getty Images

Bradshaw has admitted that due to some health issues, he can’t run or play with his grandkids like he used to be able to do. Bradshaw played in the NFL for 14 seasons, winning four Super Bowls and a league MVP.

“I can’t run. I can’t play with my grandkids the way I used to. And I don’t like that,” Bradshaw has said.

Bradshaw, who has twice faced cancer and other health obstacles, has made it a priority to visit his doctor.

“I’ve got grandkids, I don’t wanna have pneumococcal pneumonia knock me down,” Bradshaw admitted in 2018.

“I’ve got a bucket list I want to fill up, I got horses I want to raise.

“I got grandkids to play with, I got grandkids on the way.

“I’m not gonna be one of those men that doesn’t go see his doctor.”

Terry Bradshaw in New Orleans.
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA – FEBRUARY 06: Former NFL Player and NFL Sunday co-host Terry Bradshaw speaks to the media during FOX Sports Media Day at Ernest N. Morial Convention Center on February 06, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by Sean Gardner/Getty Images)

Sean Gardner/Getty Images

Bradshaw has made it pretty clear that he wants to stay on the air for as long as possible, too.

“I told Fox: ‘If I could just die on the show, think about the ratings, right?,” he said amid the retirement talk.

“Are we not about ratings? That’d be huge. Not only that, there would be a huge carryover.”

It sounds like Bradshaw will be back in 2025, but hopefully he’ll be at 100 percent health while returning to the broadcast.